Beyond economic stability
Originally published by Jamaica Observer Read the original
GOVERNMENT
Senator Sherene
Golding Campbell
opened the Senate’s State
of the Nation Debate last
Friday by declaring that
Jamaica can no longer afford
to be satisfied with economic
stability, arguing that the
country must now urgently
turn that foundation into
greater productivity and
stronger public services that
are felt by ordinary Jamaicans.
Golding Campbell said
the next phase of Jamaica’s
development must focus on
converting the gains made in
achieving macroeconomic and
fiscal stability into tangible
improvements in income, opportunities, living standards,
and wealth, while confronting systems that she said
have contributed to low productivity, weak accountability
o build on the foundation that
has been laid to turn stability
into opportunity, resilience
into growth, and economic
progress into a better quality
of life for every Jamaican. And
there’s always a challenge,
when one is behind the eight
ball. And though we have made
progress, we could have done
so much more in these last 64
years…It means that every
single one of us must approach
the development of Jamaica
with the urgency of borrowed
time, as if it is a task we each
need to finish before we die,”
she said.
But she warned that achieving that transformation would
require Jamaica to tackle
long-standing weaknesses in
the public service, particularly the way in which government services are delivered
and holding public officers
accountable.
“There can be no transformation of this nation into the
robust and growing economy
and productive society that
it can be without significant
reforms of the public service
system in relation to the kinds
of services we deliver to our
people, how we deliver them,
and the systems of accountability and rules that govern
those who must deliver those
services from the lowest levels
to the highest levels,” she said.
The senator called for a
stronger culture of personal
responsibility among public
officers, while stressing that
she is not suggesting that
every public servant performs
poorly. Her concern, she said,
is with what she described as
a systemic problem in the way
citizens are served.
She pointed to delays in responding to telephone calls,
correspondence, and applications as examples of the
difficulties Jamaicans can encounter when dealing with the
Government.
She proposed, among other
measures, the establishment of
local “knowledge centres” that
would allow citizens to obtain
information about government
services and programmes from
a single, accessible location
instead of having to visit
several agencies to determine
what documents or steps are
required.
She said the centres could
take different forms, including
physical locations, technology-supported kiosks or online
portals.
“The Jamaican citizen
should not have to navigate
the machinery of government.
Government should navigate
itself on behalf of the citizen,”
Golding Campbell said.
She also called for greater
devolution of decision-making authority within the public
service, arguing that routine
decisions should not have to
move through multiple layers
of approval.
However, she said greater
authority must be accompanied by clear standards and
consequences.
Golding Campbell also linked
public sector pay to performance, arguing that the significant salary adjustments
made for public officers in 2022
should have been accompanied
by stronger systems for measuring performance.
“Improved salaries must walk
hand in hand with performance
standards. Discussions about
improved salaries must be accompanied by talks about performance metrics and how we
measure whether the people of
Jamaica are getting value for
money,” she said.
She further called for faster
digitisation and greater integration across government, including standardised ministry
websites, more accessible application processes and improved
publication of public data.
The senator argued that
citizens and businesses should
be able to track applications
and obtain information about
their status, particularly in areas
such as building approvals, land
titles, work permits, criminal
record expungement, and the
administration of estates.
She also called for common
databases between ministries
and agencies so that information already supplied to
one government entity can be
accessed by another, where
necessary, to provide a public
service.
“A farmer cannot begin to
approach financial institutions
to fund any investment in his
farming business if his land
titling process is delayed. A
family awaiting the administration of their deceased loved
one’s estate, in order to sell
property to finance their family
business or send children to
university, is in limbo until the
process is completed,” she said.
She argued that the
Government should conduct
audits of its systems and
business processes to identify
unnecessary steps, duplication
and excessive layers of approval.
That argument formed
the basis of one of Golding
Campbell’s strongest calls for
reform — a significant overhaul
of Jamaica’s public procurement
framework.
She argued that procurement
should not be focused primarily
on procedural compliance at the
expense of efficiency, value for
money, and timely delivery.
“It appears that we managed
to convince ourselves that we
needed to create a procurement system that was not fit
for purpose, not to ensure efficient, fair, and transparent
procurement, but to operate
as some sort of pseudo-law
enforcement system guarding
against anyone who would dare
fall out of compliance with or
defy the burdensome rules and
processes we created to ensure
that government can really only
procure goods and services at
high cost with built-in inefficiencies and discretionary powers
to procuring entities to further
increase delay and cost,” she
said.
Golding Campbell identified several problems faced by
businesses seeking government
contracts, including what she
described as the absence of a
consolidated, up-to-date version
of the Procurement Act, incorporating amendments made
since the legislation was enacted
in 2015.
She also argued that the procurement system is too rigid and
could result in tenders being
cancelled and restarted, increasing costs for both government
and businesses.
Golding Campbell proposed
a less onerous procurement
process, accompanied by severe
penalties for those who deliberately breach the rules, arguing
that the threat of serious consequences could encourage
compliance without subjecting
every procurement exercise to
excessive procedural burdens.